Bulletproof Monk: Reviews

Reviews Reviews:
Bulletproof Monk
All Content Used With Permission.


TIP: Log In to enable enhanced Interact features.NEED HELP?

    by Jeff Young




With John Woo and Terence Chang among its producers, Paul Hunter's feature directing debut is assured of a certain quality whatever its success in translating the comicbook source material into big screen action. From an opening scene in Tibet, 1943 - where a mountaintop Buddhist temple housing an ancient scroll is invaded by Nazi troops, the story continues in America 60 years later, where the ageless, wandering monk-with-no-name (Chow Yun-fat) - who has "the trust of time" - is still being hunted by the obsessed Struker (Karel Roden), who dreams of world domination, and wants the scroll's magical powers to use as a supreme weapon.

After meeting streetwise New York pickpocket and kung fu student Kar (Seann William Scott) and mysterious heiress Jade (Jamie King), the Monk fends off a gang of armed thieves led by Struker's granddaughter Nina (Victoria Smurfit), and realises that, according to prophesy, Kar has a unique destiny linked to the scroll's ultimate power and enlightenment...

As with Michael Ritchie's The Golden Child (1986), and the Cynthia Rothrock vehicle Prince Of The Sun (1990), this fantasy adventure is somewhat influenced by Spielberg's Indiana Jones movies. It mixes eastern and western themes, and showcases the Zen calm of "fortune cookie philosophy," martial arts proficiency and character-driven humour, with sci-fi trappings like a brain-drain machine. It has veteran actor Mako appearing as cinema owner Kojima, and boasts some fine CGI shots and digitally erased wirework in the abundance of well-choreographed stunts. The serenity and wisdom stemming from the oriental Temple of Sublime Truth contrasts sharply with the urban turf values and aggressive US tendencies represented by the underground lair of Mr Funktastic's Manhattan subway gang, and the main villains are cunning enough to use a human rights organisation as a front for their mercenaries' mission to steal the 'Scroll of the Ultimate'.

This is a slickly edited adventure movie delivering plenty of good harmless fun, decent visual effects and a number of clever jokes, but it fails to be anything more than straightforward popcorn entertainment. A shame really, as judging from the closing scenes, I'd guess the filmmakers were hoping this might result in a sequel or even a new franchise...

LOG IN TO COMMENT ON THIS REVIEW!



    by DVDTalk
    www.dvdtalk.com




Every sixty years, someone is chosen to be the protector of The Scroll of the Ultimate, a mystical text that contains the secrets to great power and near infinite vitality. In 1943, a Tibetan monk (Chow Yun Fat) takes on this responsibility and becomes the Monk With No Name. Immediately he finds himself on the run from a Nazi commander, Strucker (Karel Roden), who wants the scroll for his own nefarious needs.

Cut to sixty years later and the monk crosses paths with New York pickpocket and self taught martial artist Kar (Sean William Scott). When they meet, Kar has run into trouble with a gang called The Crew and fallen for one of its members, Bad Girl/Jade (Jamie King), a Russian Mafioso princess. After witnessing Kar in an act of selflessness and using fighting skills, the monk believes that Kar may meet the prophecies that point to his successor. But, for Kar, it takes some convincing. It isn't every day a parable spouting monk starts following you around and getting you mixed up with mystical scrolls and crazed Nazi geniuses who have dedicated their lives to hunting eternal life and superhuman power.

Very loosely based on a comic that nobody read, the film Bulletproof Monk lacks chemistry. And I don't just mean the obvious chemistry you think of in film- chemistry between actors. While it is missing that, it also seems to lack chemistry in every major department. From the comedy in the script to the lack of tension and style in the fight choreography, it fails with every major element it wants to work on. They do their best, but Yun Fat and Scott never gel and Scott and King are completely unconvincing as a scrappy lovestruck couple. The film repeats the same Eastern parable jokes, and I didn't manage the slightest giggle at the first one, let alone the twenty or so more that followed. The fighting is all pretty unremarkable, with wirework that has little fluidity, and the finale is ill-staged in a dull location.

It is also a good example of bad, blatant CGI. Yes, it may be a comic book fantasy film, but scenes like the opening fight on a rope bridge suspended across a deep cavern is so obviously computer enhanced, you wonder why anyone would allow it. The real annoyance is, the backdrop doesn't look the slightest bit convincing or even particularly pretty, yet it had to be more expensive than the traditional method of a matte painting. Slapping a Motel 6 painting in the background would have looked better. So, what is the point of a CGI backdrop if it doesn't look good and a cheaper method could have been used for the background? I assume their reasoning is that because CGI is more expensive and new it must be better.

They went to all sorts of trouble to carefully erase the wirework wires, yet you can often clearly see the harness rigging underneath the actors clothes. That is something I can forgive in cheaper HK films, but not in something with Bulletproof Monk's budget. It is pretty telling that, in the film, Kar lives above an old chop socky movie theater with Descendant of Wing Chun on the marquee. Descendant of Wing Chun probably cost about half of Jamie King's hairdresser's salary, and it is far more entertaining than Bulletproof Monk.

I've been watching Chow Yun Fat for well over a decade now and through his HK film career I've seen him in just about every genre possible, except for maybe porno and animation. I've watched him in macho gunplay, in silly comedy, in melodrama, in romance, in fantasy b-films, and in buddy action films. Yet, he didn't really do martial arts films. I assume because of the success of Crouching Tiger and the general Western assumption that because he's Asian he must be suited as a martial hero, that was the thinking behind this film becoming a project directly aimed at him. But, I just don't think it is his strong suit, or at least, not when directed in the sloppy ways he is in Bulletproof Monks fights.

In his HK days, what made Yun Fat an engaging actor was that, no matter if it was a star vehicle or a small slumming film, he always seemed to have some degree of gusto and passion for his roles. He still has charisma, but since making the US move, his output has dwindled and his films just don't click. Part of it probably has a lot to do with directors ill-suited for the genres and often first timers, like this and Replacement Killers. But the largest factor, I think, is the Hollywood industries way of working. It only took a whopping twelve producers to make Bulletproof Monk, including John Woo and Yun Fat's former manager Terrence Chang. It is another overscrutinized, mass appeal, PG-13 action film with a Hollywood jury assigned to make sure Bulletproof Monk was as commercial as possible (which, according to the box office, didn't work). In the process, it just becomes a diluted mess, and all the charming smiles of Chow Yun Fat cannot save it... Oh well, at least the soundtrack wasn't a bunch of Top 40 hip hop.

LOG IN TO COMMENT ON THIS REVIEW!



CLOSE THIS WINDOW

This window is a "pop-up" from at HKFlix.com.
If you've arrived here from somewhere else,
please CLICK HERE for our home page!