 |  |  |  |  This film was a good retrospect because we are able to get a glimpse of life for Chan Ho Nam, Chicken and the others as kids and how hard life was for them; and what pushed them to take the direction in life that they did. Nicholas Tse and Sam Lee stepped in and made us believe that they had, in fact, developed the characters of Chan Ho Nam Chicken as played by Ekin Cheng and Jordan Chan. The character portrayals just seemed to fit and flow, to fall in step with what had already been committed to film by the latter two actors. This was an enjoyable prequel. | | LOG IN TO COMMENT ON THIS REVIEW! |
|  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  | | Adding the 1989 Chinese Student Movement is indeed awkward and the scenes at the projects and at the peak are reminiscent of Fruit Chan's Made in Hong Kong. But they are all empty images. For without the support of emotions, the script comes across as anemic. The idea of an adolescent Chan Ho-nam is, not unlike God of Gamblers 3 -- The Early Years, an effort to capitalize on a brand name and is therefore lacking in creativity. As for the whitewashing of the triad, it is already apparent in the two previous chapters - if a kid can't succeed in school, the only alternative is the mob. This is not so different from the message in Johnnie Mak's exploitative "bargirl pictures" - girls who fail in school have no alternative but be prostitutes. | | LOG IN TO COMMENT ON THIS REVIEW! |
|  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  | | I always think that someone who has a brain between his ears will never be Chan Ho-nam. But then the young Ho-nam can already think. I never doubted that the mature Ho-nam needs to be self-analytical but if he's so aware when he's a kid, then all the ignorant restlessness and wild impulsiveness of gang youth are erased. The film is more concerned with describing the times then with depicting the generation. The most tension-filled scene is the one in which everyone is confused and lost when the young Ho-nam is injured, the most disappointing is the wasting of Chicken as a character and the most awkward is the love between Nicholas Tse and Shu Qi. This is not a truly adolescent-oriented Young & Dangerous. | | LOG IN TO COMMENT ON THIS REVIEW! |
|  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |
| After five films and one spin-off (Portland Street Blues), it's not a bad idea to make a prequel of the Young and Dangerous series. And to have Nicholas Tse play the young Chan Ho-nam and Sam Lee the kid Chicken is indeed inspired. But other than the portrayal of the "father-son" relationship between Ho-nam and his mentor Big Brother B, who died in Part I, the other characters' appearance is little more than rehashing old stuff. There is also nothing surprising about the development of the friendship between the four main characters. Andrew Lau's mad rush into movement and pacing with his camera is lacking in creative energy. A lot happens in the film's almost-two hour length, but all seems familiar. The school principal and the other parents' bias against Ho-nam's poor upbringing in the film's first half is all so formulaic and the association of June Fourth and the rumble in the end is so unconvincing it's embarrassing. |
| | LOG IN TO COMMENT ON THIS REVIEW! |
|  |  |  |  |
|