Agreement:90% of 152 voters agree with JV47842's reviews Gender: Male Age: 25 Location: United States
Bio: I am 25 yr old man & I love films, I love every genre. My favorite genres are martial arts flicks, action, & film noirs. My background is filipino & I also trained in filipino martial arts which I recieved a black belt. I recently retired from the military. Now, working for a film magazine. I love Bruce Lee, Gordon Liu, Donnie Yen, Jackie Chan, Jet Li, Yuen Biao, Sammo Hung, Yuen Wo Ping, Cynthia Khan, Michelle Yeoh, Lo leigh, Wang Yu, Jacky Wu, & Stephen Chow films.
"Kuro-Obi" is a film that delivers the goods. Not only does it have amazing choreography but it also has a wonderful story that will stand the test of time. The film is intelligent, and that is something we don't see in martial arts pictures anymore. Today's standards of a martial arts film is packed with insane special effects and most of the time the story suffers because of the ridiculous CGI. "Kuro-Obi" is a movie that will open doors in the martial art cinema, it is elegant, with excellent fights, and the film is done realistically.
The story is simple, it is set in the early years of the Showa Era in 1932, Japan. The film revolves around three aspiring black belt students each trying to gain respect from their master for the kuro-obi belt. During this era the police is taking over any judo schools for their own purpose and knowledge to over run Japan. Their master suddenly dies and leaves one of his injured student to choose the man that is respectful for the belt.
The actors were terrific in their given roles, because they are real life martial art masters. Akihito Yagi who plays the respectable student Giryu is amazing. Mr. Yagi’s ability to show no anger is righteous and noble. As for Tatsuya Naka who plays the corrupt student Taikan is also great for him to go outside of his code is brilliant and daring.
The movie is a thinking man’s action picture. The cinematography is gorgeous & the fights are poetic & original. “Kuro-Obi” is a movie that demands to be seen. It is also respectable fighting movie that has been missing in martial arts pictures today.
AGREE?
READER COMMENTS
AUTHOR
Y
Well said. I agree completely. This is one of those films that just restores a jaded filmgoer's faith! :)
Director and writer David Mamet has a thing for words. His films are amazing because his writing is so vibrant. The characters jump off the screen with great dialogue. The pacing of most of his movies is fast and intriguing. "Redbelt", which is his latest film, proves that the man has never left the building. The film moves with such ease, and in the end you will definitely feel rewarded. David Mamet and his alumni company has made a genuine modern samurai picture. Samurai movies have made an impact on film history; the stories are often noble with the main character struggling to uphold the code. There are many directors that have modernized the samurai films from Jean-Pierre Melville to Johnnie To. Most of the revamped samurai movies often add pop culture or a sly reference to Akira Kurosowa, but with "Redbelt" the movie feels fresh and adds so much more for the experienced samurai fan and any casual viewer.
The story is about a young man named Mike Terry who owns a self defense studio, he teaches a class following the samurai code. The studio is seeing financial problems though the young man does not seem to care. Mike Terry knows that his life is tough, but his codes make it easier for him to survive until a tragic night which triggers events which turn his world upside down.
The film amazes me because in the beginning the environment is so peaceful and throughout the movie it opens up so much from the simplicity of it to the chaotic world we live in. Nobody has ever said the road to nobility was an easy path.
David Mamet has written an intelligent film . He has opened up a new world in the modernized samurai picture and it will leave any viewer with amazement. It also has brilliant dialogue which adds so much volume to the story's twists and turns. Mr. Mamet’s alumni cast are perfect for the film. “Redbelt” is a movie that survives multiple viewings, it's one of those films that is rare in cinema today.
So true. This film is outstanding and compelling. When Mike Terry's girlfriend asks if he feels his code is noble and he says he believes it is correct I wanted to get out of my seat and scream "HELL YEAH!" I might have.
Jean-Pierre Melville's "Army of Shadows" is a masterpiece. I could end my review there, but that won't tempt the casual viewer on watching a movie about the French resistance. I have seen a lot of films about resistance fighters, but each of those films will never ever come close to this amazing work. Mr. Melville is a genius, he has updated the gangster genre with "Le Samouraï" and "The Red Circle" in hyped-up, pop culture adaptations which still excite viewers today. "Army of Shadows" works as a gangster picture. In gangster films the characters often don’t speak like normal citizens. They live by their own rules and laws--to them it’s freedom, but for the audience it seems as if they're trapped in their own world. There are many films that capture people in their unique lifestyle--such films as “The Godfather” or “Goodfellas”--but nobody has taken it to the extreme such as this French 1969 lost gem.
Americans were not privileged to see this classic picture until 2005. Upon its initial release, the movie was banned because of an uproar in Vietnam. Though the movie is set in World War II, the story could work for any generation. The film is based upon Joseph Kessel's classic novel about French resistance fighters' lives and how they kept their cool amongst their enemies. The novel was also about traitors and the paranoia of being caught. Director Jean-Pierre Melville gave a lot of input to this film for he was a resistance fighter too. He knew the risks that every fighter took.
The score is amazing and catchy, it makes the film so vibrant. Johnnie To had updated the score for his bodyguard masterpiece “The Mission”. "Army of Shadows" and "The Mission" share a lot of resemblance. Johnnie To claims to be Melville's biggest fan--he tributes his work in many of his movies. If it's not the catchy theme he takes, then he references Melville’s coolness of characters. The list of talent that admire Mr. Melville's phenomenal work goes on and on. It amazes me how a French director made such an influential impact on movies and people today.
“Army of Shadows” is a gritty film about real people and their war. The movie may not have epic gun battles or fights, but the film relies on its characters and their ongoing battle with the enemy. The story plays as a suspenseful cat and mouse game with danger at every corner.
The film is an ignition of daring moments and it’s courageous that resistance fighters would go the extreme for their country. Jean-Pierre Melville has directed a movie that demands to be seen by everyone. The picture is worth every penny, and especially in today’s society the film will question your portrayal for your country. What is a patriot? And would you risk your life for others?
AGREE?
READER COMMENTS
AUTHOR
Y
Great review. I've always tried debating whether I like this or Le Samourai more. But in the end, who cares? They're both great. Masterpiece pretty much sums it up.
Melville is a class act director, his work is brilliant & flawless. "Army Of Shadows" is a prime example why films are made today. The film is perfect. Great review
Whenever I watch a Quentin Tarantino film, it's a journey through time. A Tarantino film can mash decades upon decades and still give a crowd-pleasing movie. The director is very talented, he mixes genres and puts cult icons among pop culture. There is only a handful of directors that can do it so well, and plus with today's generation; films are often remakes or adaptations of comics. Though Tarantino takes material from films that he enjoys, it feels different because he is not stealing the material. He's basically capturing the material in his own point of view.
It was April 2007 and I spent almost three and a half hours in a darkened theater room full of fan boys and girls. The event of this elbow-to-elbow show was "Grindhouse", one of the best movie experiences I have ever had. It's great to be in a room full of people that have the same taste in films, it makes any movie venture amazing. The film that most of the screaming fans were waiting for was "Death Proof", and it was a complete joy as soon as the title came to the screen. The film of course started with a foot fetish galore, because it is a Tarantino film.
There's is a lot of debate that this film has two halves, to me this is just another grind house experience. "Death Proof" starts off with disc jockey talk leading to bar talk. Plus a cameo from gore hound Eli Roth as a drunken partier. The film doesn't really kick into high gear until the presence of Kurt Russell's creepiness at the bar. His role of "Stuntman Mike" is funny, offbeat, and scary. The true stars of the film are muscle cars, a 1970 Chevy Nova and a 1969 Dodge Charger. The car gave Stuntman Mike's momentum to actually cause true danger, without the car he's basically harmless but still creepy. I believe it's the car that makes someone a bad ass, and without it you lose all the bad ass appeal. The same theory goes with the man with a gun, without the gun he better know some kung fu, and if he doesn't know he's screwed.
"Death Proof" is a wild ride, the last half switches gears from creepy Kurt Russell to playful Russell. Plus the stunt work from Zoe Bell is jaw breaking. The car chase is great and it never slows down, with wonderful dialogue that keeps you on the edge of your seat. The film's ending is the best I've seen from 2007. "Death Proof" is a true grind house experience mixing horror, car chases, car crashes, foot fetishes, women out for revenge, stereotypes, amazing stunt work, catchy dialogue, and a nice score. This movie has it all.
Good review dude, the movie is great- it has everything for anybody. There is a lot of people that dislike this movie, but hey the director is a true fan boy making movies for the true fans.
Drive [Director's Cut] [Medusa] (product link) Action/Adventure / Martial Arts
I view this movie at least once a year amongst my friends and family, it puts everyone in a happy state of mind. "Drive" is a B-movie that can work for any audience. The film is fun and it succeeds where most action oriented films fail. "Drive" offers insane action mixed with great humor. The film is energetic and it shows from talent onscreen and off screen. The film works so well because of the two main actors, Mark Dacascos and Kadeem Hardison. They offer a great relationship, and the pairing is unique but it mixes so well. In my opinion this is what the “Rush Hour” films should have been.
The action in “Drive” is the real showcase. The movie offers explosive action sequences one after another. It also offers witty one-liners and villains that sound and act as if they popped out from a comic book. Mark Dacascos also shows his skills in the movie--he and fight choreographer Koichi Sakamoto make a vibrant duo. The fights are amazing and the camera work is impressive. Director, Steve Wang has done an incredible job. The introduction of Brittany Murphy also adds comic relief and brings added energy on-screen. “Drive” is a B-movie, but it’s one of the best B-movies ever made. The picture stands out for its action, but the viewer gets so much more with laughs and crazy villains.
The major problem I had with the film was its open-ending. I hope some time in the future there will be a sequel of some kind. This is one of those movies that you just don’t want to end. The film paces fast from start to finish, and by the time it ends you're going to rewatch it all over again. Trust me on that, I’ve done it lots of times with this film.
The movie is a must-own for any DVD collector. The talents and action of “Drive” make it one hell of a good time!
AGREE?
READER COMMENTS
AUTHOR
Y
Great film! Great performances by Dacascos and Kadeem Hardison
"The Mist" is a captivating tale about the human race. This is what happens when loads of monsters are unleashed in a small town, and you're stuck in a grocery store with an ultra-zealous nut and would be heroes.
Stephen King's short story shines in this movie, the adaptation is smooth and the open-ended short story has more of a well done ending for the viewers. I've always felt that Mr. King's earlier novels were done with more patience and effort than his later works. In my eyes Stephen King is a talented writer, shifting his genres from suspense, drama, romance and comedy. The genre changing is hard to accomplish but he does it with such ease.
The director of "The Mist" is Frank Darabont, this will make it his 4th outing with Mr. King. First was "The Woman In the Room", "Shawshank Redemption", and "The Green Mile." Darabont and King's collaboration is always amazing--the two work well together. Their movies seem to give something more to the audience.
"The Mist" is one of the best monster movies I have seen. The film did provide chills, and Thomas Jane's performances is very convincing. Plus Marcia Gay Harden's potrayal of Mrs. Camordy is priceless. The movie and short story is like a "Twilight Zone" episode. In a "Twilight Zone" episode you usually have a group of survivors clashing with a major diaster in the background. The film is entertaining and it did have one of the best endings I have seen in awhile.
AGREE?
READER COMMENTS
AUTHOR
Y
I just saw this flick in Black & white the other day, it was amazing, it felt like a Twilight Zone episode.
I love how this movie begins. It puts the audience right in the middle of a deteriorating town. We watch two dirty men walking the streets and the only thing that is on their mind is food. The dust storm in the opening scenes adds a great effect that the town is rotting. At first sight it seems as if there is no hope for anybody in this town. When the story progresses, the story is full of hope. Director Kihachi Okamoto is very talented at shifting the scenery from a character's expression. Mr. Okamoto has done that with “The Sword Of Doom”. The character in that movie was in a fury of revenge so he added lightning and thunder for added effects. Kihachi Okamoto has always been an inspiration of mine, because he knows how to make a solid story into something more.
The story is taken from the novel “Peaceful Days”, written by Shugoro Yamamoto. The novel was also the source for Kurosawa’s "Sanjuro" and "Yojimbo". This is the closest adaptation of Yamamoto’s novel. It’s great to see what writer Akira Murao and director Okamoto were inspired by.
“Kill!” is about two men. Genta has given up the samurai code, and Hanjiro is a farmer masquerading as a samurai. They stumble upon seven dimwitted samurai who murder a vassal of the Shogun on behalf of a local boss named Chamberlain Ayuzawa.
The samurai send Genta to their boss to inform him of the success of their mission. Hanjiro goes to Ayuzawa to get a job, and to become a real samurai. Hanjiro’s mind and heart are tested because in order to become a samurai, he has to kill Genta.
It amazes me how the characters' lives in the movie intervene. They have goals, and they could easily be accomplished, but whatever road you choose there are always consequences. The movie does go in depth in that department, but the film also offers a lot of laughs. The humor in the movie is well added, each line or action is done well and right on cue. This is a also a witty samurai movie. With that being said, the movie feels fresh and intelligent, as if it was made today.
“Kill!” is a movie that can work for any audience. The genre is an action-adventure story, but it adds drama and laughter, which makes it feel like an “every person kind of film“. I am astonished how good this picture is and how it paces itself into a truly amazing samurai picture.
AGREE?
READER COMMENTS
AUTHOR
Y
This Samurai movie is on my top 5 samurai films. The movie is amazing.
Absolutely a perfect review for this phat-ass movie. Informative and entertaining. This film is on my top 25 samurai films of all time list. Actually more like top 15. Keep em' comin, player.
The Third Man (product link) Mystery / Thriller "The Third Man" is my all-time favorite film. Everyone should own this in their DVD library. If not, you're missing a truly remarkable cinema experience.
The film was made in 1949, but Graham Greene's great dialogue sounds and feels as if it were made today. Carol Reed's stylish and vibrant direction looks fresh and new. The music of the film is the best I have ever heard. The action is very tense, especially the chase in the sewers. The film feels as if it were ahead of its time. It's a true classic that can still hold up for any generation.
"The Third Man" is one of those films that should not be missed.
AGREE?
READER COMMENTS
AUTHOR
Y
Sounds very interesting. I'm going to have to check that out. Thanks for the warm reception by the way. It felt weird not hanging out here. Good to know that you guys kept this place in top form dispite some of these new posers. I got your six.
The Ruins (product link) Horror / Thriller "The Ruins" is a great adaptation of the award-winning horror novel from Scott B. Smith. The author also wrote the suspenseful tale "A Simple Plan".
"The Ruins" is defiently not for the faint of heart. The film is intense and gory. The film also reminds me what a real horror film should be, since mainstream scare flicks are geared towards teenie boppers.
The flick is a real scare, and the atmosphere in the movie is full of tension. If you want a real horror pic, then get this film now.
AGREE?
READER COMMENTS
AUTHOR
Y
I tend to avoid US horror because it tends to just bore. But, on this review, I gave it watch and was quite happy with the result. Nice call.
The 2006 Korean gangster picture "A Dirty Carnival" reminds me of Hollywood gangster pictures that James Cagney would star in. Mr. Cagney starred in a lot of crime pictures for Warner Brothers in the 1930's. His character was always some mad gangster lunatic for vengeance. James Cagney's role in "White Heat" reminds me of the starring role of this film.
The story is fascinating, about Byung-du who is a 29-year-old career criminal working for the middle-rank enforcer Sang-chul. Burdened with a terminally ill mother and taking care of younger siblings, Byung-du is feeling financial pressure as a substitute patriarch. When the big boss President Hwang is cornered by a corrupt prosecutor, Byung-du volunteers for a whack job and wins the big man's trust. However, his real trouble begins when friend Min-ho, an aspiring movie director, asks him to be a consultant for the latter's debut film.
The performances from the actors and actresses were wonderfully done. The cast made it look easy, and that is a trick, especially in a movie full of twists and turns.
I absolutely love the score of the picture. It has a classical instrumental French vibe to it, and somehow it fits perfectly in this Korean crime movie. The action--or should I say killings--was realistic and it shows. The punches, kicks, and stabbings were done realistically. There was no Hollywood element to it. The director and writer, Ha Yu, made an excellent gangster movie. “A Dirty Carnival” has beautiful shots. Though it is violent and gritty, Mr. Ha Yu has a great eye of the world. In this film we see two sides: the civilian side of living, and the gangster side of living. It’s an achievement how he captures them both.
“A Dirty Carnival” is the most realistic and violent gangster picture I have ever seen. The performances and story are captivating to watch. The score is amazing. I love this picture.
AGREE?
READER COMMENTS
AUTHOR
Y
The pressure was on. I bought this flick because of your review. Kudos. I loved it. Great call.
"Dirty Carnival" has an amazing musical score, it makes the film so alive. This being a gangster film it lets loose of what the audience expects from a gangster film. The film is a real joy & a gem for anybody, its sad tht not enough people have seen it
Thai action movies have two categories: there is the "good" category, like "Ong-Bak"; and then there is the "this film sucks" category, like "Fighting-Beat" or "Dynamite Warrior". In some cases a Thai action film just ends up in the middle, like "Chocolate". The movie "Brave" ends up in the middle category--it doesn't suck that much but it's not that good. There is a new fighting sensation in town and I am not talking about JeeJa Yanin. I am talking about Mike B. This guy has moves and his moves remind me of early Jackie Chan films.
The movie "Brave" showcases his style in two good action scenes. The memorable one is inside a construction site where he dodges and kicks the hell out of people. Also in that scene there is a spectacular stunt where Mike B. jumps off the building and catches an iron rod hanging from the ledge. It was impressive, because Mike B. does his own stunts too. The second good fight is at the end where he kicks and punches his way out of the building.
"Brave" has some good action set pieces, but where that delivers everything else just fails. The story is about a young man who is forced by the mafia to steal a bank's client data in exchange for his brother's life and discovers he and his brother have been set up. It sounds simple reading it, but following it is confusing. The writer adds subplots about Mike B's fat brother which make no sense or give any added detail about the characters. There is a lot of double crossing in a movie that shouldn't have any double crossing set-up to begin with. The majority of the people that are going to watch this film are martial arts fans. The director and writer should have taken that into consideration. In "Brave" we have some nice action pieces but the story and acting are horrible. Also with "Brave" we don't get an ending, well not a clear ending--it simply just ends.
This film is a mess but I did enjoy the two action pieces. "Brave" is not a movie to get hyped up about. Aside from the two action pieces, you still have 72 minutes of a confusing story to follow. Mike B. is very talented and hopefully with his next movie it shows.
I saw the movie "Doomsday" in March of 2008 in theaters. I remember watching it back then in a crowded room full of Neil Marshall fans and when it ended we weren't impressed and I was annoyed by how sloppy the film was and the many references to better films that Mr. Marshall puts into a 113-minute movie. The crowd and I were disappointed with the film because it's a mess. Neil Marshall has given great work in the past. His first film, "Dog Soldiers", showed a promising director. The second movie he made was "The Descent", it was thrilling fun-house scare. It reminded me what a horror film should be. Then came "Doomsday". By watching the film, you can't help think that the director wanted to go a new route--instead of a carnage, cringing, and captivating horror film he wanted to make an action picture; and how the horror and action collide baffles me. Did Neil Marshall write this movie when he was intoxicated? Because the uncut version and the cut version look sloppily made.
The story is over-the-top about a virus that spreads throughout England killing thousands of people. The government decides to quarantine the virus site. The quarantine is successful. Three decades later, the Reaper Virus violently resurfaces in a major city. A team of specialists, including Eden Sinclair, is urgently dispatched into the still-quarantined country to retrieve a cure by any means necessary. When I first read about the plot, I thought it was going to be exciting and original. It wasn't either exciting or original, The film had too many references to better movies.
I enjoy directors that acknowledge other directors or films in their movies. If a director can do that in his movie it makes it more personal for the audience. Quentin Tarantino does that with all his films in a way that it is personal but somehow original. The sharing of references goes for a lot of directors from Paul Thomas Anderson to the Coen brothers. Neil Marshall did a wonderful job of good reference in "Dog Soldiers"--he is a fan of Sam Rami's "Evil Dead" series and with "Dog Soldiers" it truly shows. "Doomsday" on the other hand had a promising plot but just ended up as a mess with too many references like the virus spreading, which is from "28 Days Later", to Eden Sinclair's one eye from "Escape From New York", the quarantine wall looks like it is from "Jurassic Park", the bus chase is from Walter Hill's "The Warriors", the post-apocalyptic wardrobes and car chase is from "The Mad Max" trilogy, and the castle and castle wardrobes is from "Robin Hood" or "Lord Of The Rings". The movie is just one big shout-out to better films.
"Doomsday" is not an original film, the visual style is sloppy, and either cut or uncut you still get bad editing. The many references to better movies ruins any credit of a good time at the movies. If Neil Marshall does not want be the horror guy anymore, he should have made a straightforward action picture. In "Doomsday" we get a mess of everything that Mr. Marshall enjoys and more. If you enjoy a messy film then you would enjoy this mess. There is one good point to the film which is, it's about time that we see the beautiful Rhona Mitra get a starring role. I am tired of seeing her in the background of other movies playing a supporting character. Though she may want to call her agent, because she should have been in the background of this sloppy movie.
AGREE?
READER COMMENTS
AUTHOR
Y
What happened here? The director went crazy & didn't really give us an original story. This movie being for the fan boy or girl, really dissappoints them though bc it tries to be like the other films- it just fails into a complete crap masterpiece.
Chocolate [2008] (product link) Martial Arts / Action/Adventure
Thailand's action director Prachya Pinkaew's latest martial arts effort, "Chocolate", misses its punches and kicks on the story and character development. It also misses Mr. Pinkaew's trademark of over-the-top action sequences. The director has given audiences thrilling martial arts masterpieces from "Ong-Bak" and "The Protector". I suspected that Prachya Pinkaew wanted to go a new route in a martial arts movie, which is to focus on a emotional story and add some fights. The new route he has taken is lacking in heart and thrills, even "Ong-Bak" had heart about a man destine to get back a statue. "The Protector" had a man destined to get his elephant back. The director's previous movies had heart and thrills, but "Chocolate" lacks in that department. I admire directors going new routes in their films, it establishes them to be better directors. I am not putting all the blame on Prachya Pinkaew, this being the first movie he did not write. The first writer of the film wa Nepalee Sakweerakul (this is his first writing effort). Second is the writer and director of "13:Beloved", Chukiat Sakveerakul. I was very pleased with the movie "13:Beloved". It was a throwback to Alfred Hitchcock films and I enjoyed the comic. But with the film "Chocolate", we get a sloppily written story, which makes the film messy.
The set-up of the movie is very slow. The audience is not introduced to the new fighting sensation JeeJa Yanin until twenty minutes in the movie, where she is catching balls (literally) and fruits that her chubby best friend throws at her. CGI fruit and balls helped her a lot on that scene to impress upon a crowd that she has fast reflexes, and then a young punk throws a knife at her. We are finally introduced to her kicks and punches in a brief altercation. This was the twenty-minute mark. If you are a patient viewer, you would have to sit through the story about a criminal boss' hench-woman and criminal boss' associate and their love for each other. The criminal boss finds out and goes bat-crazy, shooting his own foot. The man and woman are on the run, and the woman says she's pregnant. The man leaves her and the mother is all alone taking care of her deaf child. The criminal boss returns with his drag-queen goons and cuts off one of the mother's fingers as the deaf child watches and cries. Then the scene cuts to the deaf girl, we see in a montage that she is interested in Thai fighters in front of her house, kung fu movies, her chubby friend, mom, and of course chocolate. Her kryptonite is flies, she really hates flies.
The action scenes are all right, starting with the first action sequence in the ice factory where she mimics Bruce Lee but thinks about Tony Jaa from "Ong-Bak". I was a little confused by that scene--shouldn't she have thought about Bruce Lee instead? In that scene ice is thrown at her, and she dodges it left and right. The second fight is in the warehouse where she fights atop crates and wooden platforms are thrown at her. The next action scene is in the shady butcher shop where the opponents are strapped with butcher knives and again the knives are thrown at her as she dodges them left and right. The last and final action scenes are on top of a roof where she fights thug girls that look like the fly girls from the show "In Living Color". Then the fight scene in the restaurant where she fights people with swords and a man with glasses that is on crack, I suppose. The most exciting out of all the fights is the one on top of billboards and restaurant signs--it was good and enjoyable.
The major problems of the movie were the lack of character development. I personally could not recognize any of the characters in the movie; they were lacking heart or any emotional impact. The story was a major problem too. There were a lot of parts that could of been cut out, like the beginning and some of the emotional parts. Another major problem was the action: there are three action scenes that look the same but in different locations--one in the butcher shop, second the warehouse, and third the ice factory. These action scenes were all the same with the same bad guys trying to attack JeeJa Yanin. The bad guys of the movie were a major problem as well. JeeJa Yanin fights a lot of people in the movie, but none of her opponents were really worthy, which lacks any danger for Miss Yanin. This is supposed to be a martial arts movie, we need a worthy opponent for our hero. If there are no good matches in a kung fu film, then it lacks excitement for the viewer. JeeJa Yanin's character is invincible in the movie, she is like a superhero and her kryptonite is flies. If this was supposed to be a superhero film, the writers should have established that. "Chocolate" is not a superhero film, it's about a deaf girl that fights and never gets hurts except when there are outtakes. There are a lot of martial arts films out there with a hero fighting off an opponent that is worthy to fight with. In this movie our main villain shoots himself in the foot and is surrounded by a group of drag-queen goons--maybe he should have read the guidelines on being a villain and stopped running away from a deaf girl.
"Chocolate" is not a five star masterpiece. We are missing the intense and thrilling action scenes, plus a decent story to follow. The character development is also missing. "Chocolate" is not a zero star movie, it does have some fun for the viewer. I am giving the film two and half stars even though it has three action scenes that look the same and henchmen that are no match for JeeJa Yanin. I did like the fight on top of the billboards, it was creative and original. There was a scene I enjoyed, in the butcher shop, where a man throws a knife at our hero but it bounces of a springy fence and strikes him on the shoulder. To me that's priceless entertainment.
AGREE?
READER COMMENTS
AUTHOR
Y
nice review- first real review of the movie thanks for the details. The movie has potential but didn't go anywhere
So many words for the simple action flick which solely purpose is to entertain audience which is done more than well. Isn't it better to leave the character development and other talks for psychological movies? Leave your brain and let yourself entertain.
i must disagree with you i found the film very entertaining makes a change to see a female kick plenty of ass.i suppose every one has different taste's each to there own.
"An Empress And The Warriors" is a disappointing film for all epic/martial arts film fans. At first I was excited to see an off the wall action and epic movie, that the trailer implied. In the end, I was frusrated and disappointed that I wasted my money on this garbage.
The trailer of the movie was hands down awesome! But don't be fooled by what you saw in the trailer because it is not what you get on-screen. The film is a total chick flick with short and uninspired action sequences for the men. Plus this movie is not a Donnie Yen actioner. He is one of the supporting characters. The main stars of the film are the empress and the medicine man.
There is a lot of sentimental feeling in this movie. And with the sentimental feeling comes cheesy and cliched dialogue, such as "I'll wait for you". And with the cheesy dialogue we get a homemade balloon ride over the forest with some modern, poppy, and romantic song in the background.
The action scenes are rare and brief--we get the empress protecting the medicine man's tree house. The empress in a battle scene. The empress chased in the forest. And the notable action piece, the two-minute battle with Donnie Yen kicking ass. The final action scene has the empress fighting a one on one f