| DO THEY REALLY THINK WE AMERICANS ARE THAT STUPID? (139 views) | AUTHOR / DATE |
| No, this is not a political discussion thread. This is a topic that relates directly to why I started shopping on this site. My last topic was about theatrical cuts vs. director's cuts. But here, I want to talk about something more disconcerting that profoundly affects us all: The re-editing of asian films for the US audience.
I remember seeing Ong Bak in the theaters. I went home and immediately ordered a copy online. When I got the movie the following week I immediately noticed that there was an entire subplot that had been eliminated in the theatrical version. I had seen The Protector on DVD first, back when it was TYG. Then, seeing it in the theater I saw it had been sliced down to eliminate the humorous side-story.
For some reason the version of "Casshern" they're selling in the stores here is listed as the DC despite being 30 minutes shorter. But I've not found anything to substantiate that it really is the DC.
Basically, most of these films are edited down to give you the least story possible while just rolling from one action scene to the next (if only they'd be so merciful in some US films). The US cut of 'Hero' and its lame "Our Land" was vastly inferior to the original's poetic "All Under Heaven".
I was just curious if anyone had any thoughts on this and if anyone had seen a US version they found to be superior to the original.
One positive, I did like the Ong Bak music they put in the US cut versus the original. Although Black Mask and Drunken Master 2 show us that OB is the exception and not the rule.
PS-I promise I'll get some more reviews up. Have about 5 that I'd like to put up. Just been busy and I don't want to put up something stale. Working on: Full-Time Killer, Heroes of the East, Throwdown, Breaking News, The Rebel. | Garvinstomp 10/22/2008 12:37 AM |
| #2 | I'm confused. Are we talking about U.S. versions vs. original foreign versions? Or theatrical versions vs. directors cut versions?
Whatever it may be, it just depends on the movie. I actually prefer SUPERCOP over POLICE STORY III. It's paced better. Has better music. etc. Same for the U.S. version of DRUNKEN MASTER II vs. the original.
And for director's cuts vs. original... well, take something like Battle Royale. The first cut was a lot better than the director's cut that followed. Same with NATURAL BORN KILLERS. I prefer the original cut - and this may be because I saw it first.
So, it really depends on the individual titles.
As for Ong Bak, heck, the more non-action stuff they cut out, the better. To me, action is all these Tony Jaa flicks have going for them. If they had some decent slapstick comedy, or if Tony Jaa had the charisma of Jackie Chan, I'd be saying otherwise.
| City On Fire 10/23/2008 12:02 AM |
| #3 | I was going for US versions vs. the Originals.
I agree with Ong Bak. The side story was nice, but not that necessary. In 'The Protector' the comedy was done pretty well. The sidekick and his high opinion of himself was played well.
I did like the music in Supercop better, but I liked the longer version of Drunken Master II (although the cropping of the image was unforgivable).
I still tend to like seeing the movie as it was meant to be seen. As a filmmaker it would destroy me if the foreign distributors took something I made and just hacked it up. Brutal. | Garvinstomp 10/23/2008 1:14 AM |
| #4 | Garvinstomp - I AGREE with you 100%! I have always hated the "westernized" version of Asian films. I ALWAYS prefer the original version or an edited, cut up Amercian version.
To answer your question above--YES! they do think we're that stupid and we can't understand the original version of hte a movie. I will qualify that statement by saying that you do have to understand aspects of the Asian culture to "get" some of the things that go on in some films, particularly in Japanese films. Also, sometimes words and phrases just don't translate well into English. BUT there's a difference in good subtitles and horrible ones (i.e. US version of HERO).
There are exceptions to the rule-I happen to like the Miramax version of IRON MONKEY the best, and I have the uncut HKL version. I actually like the subtitles better and the soundtrack is awesmome. I actually have the CD Soundtrack I like it so much. However, I like the uncut FILM better, just not the subs and audio. | WuxiaFan 10/23/2008 10:30 AM |
| #5 | City on Fire -- to say that you like the US version of DRUNKEN MASTER II, arguably the greatest martial art movie of all time, over the uncut Chinese version is unbelievable! I mean I'm truly stunned! It's almost insulting to true genre fans.
The uncut Chinese version is still available from this site. Why shop at HKFlix if you're not looking for the original, uncut, and rare versions of films? Wow. | WuxiaFan 10/23/2008 10:37 AM |
| #6 | SUPERCOP has better music than POLICE STORY III????? Yes, nothing better than a 1992 HK movie featuring the sweet, sweet jams of WARREN G, DOGG POUND, GWEN STEFANI and a sweeping rendition of the BEE GEE'S 'stayin' alive'. Now that is class! also the inclusion of CARL DOUGLAS' 'kung fu fighting'... I mean, how novel... how original... how mind blowingly innovative! | JAY LEE 10/23/2008 11:43 AM |
| #7 | JAY LEE: I forget about the rap on that Supercop soundtrack. I actually meant the actual orchestrated music NOT, and I repeat, NOT the rap stuff.
WuxiaFan: Sorry to stun or almost disappoint you, but it's just my opinion. Besides, hkflix carries it all: uncut, original, americanized... so everyone's preference is served. It's just a matter of opinion. Re-releases can both hurt or polish a movie. Just depends on the persons taste. | City On Fire 10/23/2008 7:07 PM |
| #8 | It seems that the topic of music has come up a fair amount. I think one of the few 'broad spectrum' problems of asian films is the soundtrack. The worst offenders are the ones trying to emulate a full orchestra on a 1986 Casio keyboard. It can be so bad it's distracting at times.
The first time I saw 'The MIssion' I thought it was a bad bootleg that someone had just stuck some license-free music over a workprint. I had the same reaction to Tsui Hark's 'Seven Swords'. It had such rich visuals that were accompanied by some low-rent John Tesh (my apologies to Tesh).
But music is the one place where sometimes the 'westernized' versions do make the overall experience better.
Also, other than movies, are there any specific scenes that have been cut that bummed you out? For me, I was disappointed when Jackie Chan was chased up the tree by the cheetah in 'Who Am I' was cut for our benefit. Just a little scene, but added a nice touch of character and fun. | Garvinstomp 10/24/2008 1:53 AM |
| #9 | Film distributors DO think we North Americans (including my Canadian self here) are that dumb. Sadly, for the most part, they are right. I'm not talking about genre aficionados like me and you, I'm talking about Joe Public average movie goer in America.
Joe Public has been weaned on shallow, crappy action fare that is all sizzle and no steak for years: quality action has been replaced by "stuff happening fast". Joe Public is too lazy (or slow) to read subtitles, and he certainly isn't interested in listening to long scenes of talking while waiting for someone to get their head kicked in.
Film distibutors have zero interest in bringing the art of foreign filmmmakers to North America, they want to turn a fat profit. Gotta get as many Joe Public asses in seats in the theater as possible, and there is only one way to appeal to Joe Public: Action that is fast, fast, fast, even it's totally empty and meaningless. | TheDenizen 10/24/2008 9:10 AM |
| #10 | In addition, watching any edited version of a movie when the original, unedited movie is available is silly. Why not watch the WHOLE film instead of just bits of it? | TheDenizen 10/24/2008 9:11 AM |
| #11 | Good topic. I first got into this whole HKFlix thing since I too was looking for uncut versions of Asian films. But the fact remains that we real film lovers and purists are a niche and not a huge demographic. Studios generally have to cater to the largest possible group of people in order to recoup their investment, even on DVD-only releases. But it does seem strikingly obvious that if you're going to alter a film for DVD, why not include the original version as well? I'll never understand that. Bastardize the film all you want, that's on your conscience, but you'd increase your sales if you also included the original versions for the true fans. | Choco 10/24/2008 9:32 AM |
| #12 | The Dragon Dynasty DVD of The Protector (Tom Yum Goong) is the perfect example of this. Sure they gave us a dumbed down American edit, but by providing the fully uncut Thai version on a separate disc, the Dragon Dynasty label earned instant credibility in my eyes. It showed the Weinsteins were actually serious about catering to the genre fans, and not just the general public. | TheDenizen 10/24/2008 9:44 AM |
| #13 | Unfortunately, I think when you say "largest possible group" you mean "lowest common denominator". It's the double-edged sword of capitalism and the free market. You gotta watch the bottom line. But, thanks to good, old supply and demand, those of us that have the demand allow a market for sites like this (and I"m thankful for it every day).
And Denizen, Tom Yum Goong is one of my favorite examples (along with the new release of 'Bullet in the Head'). Having all available versions in one package just makes sense. The original versions are already available and mastered on DVD. Unless there's a licensing issue that stipulates that western distributors have to use a different version, the cost of adding both versions in one package are relatively non-existent. | Garvinstomp 10/25/2008 2:12 AM |
| #14 | It seems that I'm always late to the party. But I always catch a hangover. Garvinstomp is totally right here. This is the give and take of commerce and the open market. People want the most gain possible and often don't mind if idea properties or artist visions are compromised. WuxiaFan is absolutely right- they do think we are that stupid. Unfortunately, they are right for the most part. Americans are extraordinarily stupid and culturally ignorant and jaded. Let's face it those of us that love and support this site for its outstanding library of Asian films in their many versions represent the minority of American movie watchers. We are the few, the proud and the enlightened. Seriously, talk to some of your coworkers about movies sometimes. That crap is like slow torture. I got one guy trying to tell me how "Dumb and Dumber" is the best comedy and I got some dude trying to talk to me about what the best action movie is and he doesn't even know who John Woo is! | Bastard Ronin 10/25/2008 2:21 PM |
| #15 | cont.- These folks with their middle America mindset make the rest of us look bad. I find myself wondering: where is my sword? and can I get to it in time to end the madness? Editted versions of movies have always bothered me. You know it's not always plot aspects and asian-centricities that are removed. To score that extra special mass audience PG-13 rating studios and execs will sometimes ditch parts of the action sequences. Good chunks of fight scenes were removed fom the American version of "Operation Condor". Editting Jackie Chan action scenes? That's just wrong. I also agree with everything Choco stated. If you could cater to the needs of both the dim-witted mass market and the connoisseurs than everbody wins, sales will maximize and they would have created a loyal and thankful patronage. Basically every distributing company sould be more like Dragon Dynasty. | Bastard Ronin 10/25/2008 2:40 PM |
| #16 | What up, BR? This site here is the first step in the right direction when it comes to seeing there's an audience for the original cuts of films. But your post also makes me realize that by distribution companies not being faithful to the original cuts we're able to have a site like this.
If all of these titles were available at Best Buy would there be enough of a market for this site to exist? I not only shop here because of the selection, but because it attracts like-minded people whose reviews steer me to things I like. I can't tell you how many films I've watched because of you and Choco and JVR and several others. So I guess there is an upside to the original cuts being available, but not as widely as the 'dumbed-down' versions. It definitely has its upside.
| Garvinstomp 10/26/2008 2:21 AM |
| #17 | Garvinstomp, I couldn't agree more. | Bastard Ronin 10/26/2008 6:26 AM |
| #18 | You gentlemen are totally correct! Since Speed Western movies have been geared toward action and not acting. The Western market has been full of special effects laden movies for audinces in lieu of story and acting. We then get horrible distributors who slice and dice original films because that is what they think Western audiences want. Yes Garvin, they think we are dumb in some respects! Fortunately as stated by BR, companies like Dragon Dynasty are emerging and giving us both versions. Swordmasters and Tokoyo Shock are offering complete versions helping to educate the Western public. Believe me guys, when I was looking for complete original versions in the early nineties, they were harder to find. We have come a long way and hopefully more distributors and companies will produce versions with the original language cut and Western version. Black Dragon a.k.a. Mr. Canton and Lady Rose is a perfect example. In the past there was only the chopped version, now.... | Sgt. T 10/26/2008 3:58 PM |